![]() ![]() Both contain the same version number and if the JVM gets a security fix, the plugin version number will be changed as well. ![]() ![]() You can see the plugin/addon and the framework as one unit, you can compare that as example with the Java plugin and the Java virtual machine. > Is it possible to serve a different blocklist to differing user agents? > Is the framework version changed by the update? If so, we should be able to True, but the later overrules the former. > - Updates should be provided as quickly as possible to enable people to secure > unless the user chooses to have that functionality removed (e.g. > - Working functionality should never be removed from an installed browser, > The general principles I feel are important here are: If explicitly labeled versions that are not potentially vulnerable are to be released then those should be opened up. Just because the add-on versions for some people could use components that are supposedly secured does not change the fact that they also can use insecure ones. The blocked add-on versions use insecure OS components and are thus insecure. The add-on blocklist, fundamentally, blocks insecure/unstable add-ons. > the new firefox version should continue being able to use the plugin. > the block only for systems with the old versions. > - release said updated mechanism as a critical firefox update, and reinstate > be made that depends on versions of installed system libraries > - as a matter of priority, update the blocklist mechanism so that a block can > - remove the extension and plugin from the blocklist What do you think? Leave a comment below and join our community at to let us know.> Just for clarities sake, my proposed solution to this issue is as follows: Let's hope it's a sign of more cooperation to come. It is nice to see these two forces, which are fierce competitors in the browser race, trying to get along for the good of their users. The Windows Presentation Foundation add-on is still being blocked, but Mozilla is working on a way for (specifically Enterprise) users to override the blocking while awaiting its official removal from the blocklist. He also added that it should be re-enabled for those users who had it enabled in the first place. Net Framework Assistant poses no threat and that Mozilla is updating the blocked add-on list accordingly. On Sunday, Shaver wrote about Microsoft's confirmation that the. According to a blog posting by Mike Shaver, Mozilla's vice president of engineering, the company discussed the decision with Microsoft and it agreed with the plan to disable the plug-ins via the blocklist. Mozilla chose to disable the plug-ins over concerns that Firefox users might be slow to install the latest patch. Net Framework Assistant, the decision was made to disable them. When Microsoft recently released a cumulative patch to Internet Explorer that resolves a vulnerability in the. Net patch issued earlier this year and were installed without user's knowledge or consent. Soon after, the status of the plug-ins was changed, and users were then warned that they would be removed when the browser is restarted after its next shutdown. Net Framework 1.1 Assistant (NFA) FireFox extension and Microsoft Windows Presentation Foundation Firefox plug-in were both placed on Firefox's block list and users who had them installed received a pop-up message alerting them of the action, calling the add-ons "unstable or insecure." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |